Fostering Robust Library Portals: An Assessment of the McMaster University Library Gateway

Working Paper #4 by Brian Detlor, Umar Ruhi, Chris Pollard, Dave Hanna, Mihail Cocosila, Wuping Zheng, Eric Fu, Tao Jiang and Demos Syros, June 2003.

  • Library portals support the information needs and uses of patrons.
  • The report proposed a five-dimension evaluation framework for robustness.
  • The McMaster University Library Gateway was assessed as a test.
  • Students of Winter 2003 class K726 carried out the assessment.
  • The Gateway showed some good characteristics.

Five dimensions

  • Usability of the system interface.
  • Support for a wide spectrum of information seeking.
  • Personalization matching individual user needs.
  • The extent to which the portal fosters knowledge work.
  • The degree to which intelligent agents are employed.

Recommendations

  • Immediate: reduce library jargon in the interface.
  • Immediate: fix screen design inconsistencies.
  • Immediate: clean up navigation problems.
  • Short term: integrated design not mimicking physical libraries.
  • Short term: make catalogue and electronic resources distinction clear.
  • Short term: provide better Web log tracking metrics.
  • Long term: personalize the site to individual user needs.
  • Long term: offer communication and collaboration areas.
  • Long term: one homepage browse/search across all library resources.
  • Long term: leverage intelligent agents.

Updated